Key result
β-blockers did not reduce the time to the primary composite endpoint in post-MI patients with LVEF ≥ 40% (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-1.01; p=0.08).
Why the study?
The efficacy of beta-blockers after MI across LVEF strata and the conclusiveness of the available evidence remained uncertain.
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce cardiovascular events in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40%)?
Meta-Analysis (n=19,826)
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce cardiovascular events in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40%)?
Hazard Ratio: 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–1.01)
p-value: p=0.08
Beta-blockers provide no cardiovascular benefit in post-MI patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%), but may reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in those with mildly reduced LVEF (40-49%).
Aims We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of β‐blockers after myocardial infarction (MI) across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) strata and to assess the conclusiveness of the available evidence using trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating β‐blockers in post‐MI patients with LVEF ≥ 40%. A time‐to‐event meta‐analysis was performed for the primary composite (as defined by each trial) and for individual endpoints. The Mantel–Haenszel method was used to pool risk ratios (RR) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; death, MI or heart failure), including LVEF‐stratified analyses. TSA estimated the required information size (RIS) and generated adjusted significance and futility boundaries, assuming a 5% type I error and 90% power. Results Across 19,826 post‐MI patients (17,941 with LVEF ≥ 50% and 1885 with LVEF 40%–49%), β‐blockers did not reduce time to the primary endpoint (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85–1.01; p = 0.08; I 2 = 35%) or mortality. In patients with preserved LVEF (≥ 50%), β‐blocker therapy did not reduce the risk of death or MACE (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87–1.05; I 2 = 42%), with TSA confirming futility. Among those with mildly reduced LVEF (40%–49%), β‐blockers reduced MACE (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.94; I 2 = 0%), although TSA failed to establish conclusiveness (RIS of 5717 [14.4%]). A significant interaction by LVEF subgroup was observed for cardiac death ( p = 0.03). Conclusions β‐blockers conferred no benefit in post‐MI patients with preserved LVEF, with conclusive evidence of futility, whereas therapy was associated with reduced MACE in those with mildly reduced LVEF, pending confirmation in further adequately powered randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maremmani et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in myocardial infarction (n=19,826). β-blockers was evaluated on primary composite (as defined by each trial) (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.01, p=0.08). β-blockers did not reduce the time to the primary composite endpoint in post-MI patients with LVEF ≥ 40% (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-1.01; p=0.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: