Key result
CRT-D upgrade reduces composite events ~92% vs ICD alone regardless of baseline frailty.
Why the study?
Data regarding the potential frailty-modifying effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade remain scarce.
Does CRT-D upgrade improve frailty status and reduce the composite of mortality, HF hospitalization, or lack of LV reverse remodeling in patients with HFrEF and RV pacing?
RCT (n=360)
3:2
Does CRT-D upgrade improve frailty status and reduce the composite of mortality, HF hospitalization, or lack of LV reverse remodeling in patients with HFrEF and RV pacing?
Odds Ratio: 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.19)
Absolute Event Rate: 34.4% vs 86.4%
p-value: p=< 0.001
CRT-D upgrade in HFrEF patients with high RV pacing burden improves frailty status and reduces adverse clinical outcomes regardless of baseline frailty.
Frailty and heart failure (HF) both have become increasingly prevalent and each adversely affects prognosis. Data regarding the potential frailty-modifying effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in the Budapest-CRT Upgrade trial population. Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and ≥ 20% right ventricular pacing burden were randomized to CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD alone (n = 145). Our primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, HF-hospitalization and or < 15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume at 12 months. Frailty was assessed using a 31-item frailty index (FI) based on the Rockwood method, and patients were dichotomized according to the median FI. Among 360 patients, the mean baseline FI was 0.39 ± 0.10, with follow-up FI available in 282 patients at 12 months. CRT-D upgrade significantly decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline FI compared to ICD alone (interaction p = 0.17). CRT-D upgrade led to a 0.03-point greater reduction in the mean FI change compared to the ICD arm (mean FI difference at 12-month - 0.03; 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.01; p = 0.005). In this highly comorbid cohort, frailty was common but it did not diminish the clinical benefit of CRT-D upgrade. CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline frailty status and led to a significant decrease in mean FI change compared to ICD alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuthi et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=360). CRT-D upgrade vs. ICD alone was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, HF-hospitalization, or < 15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume at 12 months (high-frailty burden group) (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.19, p=< 0.001). CRT-D upgrade significantly decreased the risk of the primary composite endpoint regardless of baseline frailty status and led to a significant 0.03-point greater reduction in mean Frailty Index compared to ICD alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: