Key result
Venus P valve implantation achieves ~94% success in RVOT dysfunction without deaths or re-interventions.
Why the study?
Self-expandable valves may impact the feasibility of transcatheter RVOT dysfunction treatments, and real-life multicenter data were needed following the 2022 CE mark approval of the Venus P valve.
Does percutaneous implantation of the Venus P valve improve functional class and demonstrate safety in patients with RVOT dysfunction?
Observational (n=65)
Yes
Does percutaneous implantation of the Venus P valve improve functional class and demonstrate safety in patients with RVOT dysfunction?
Real-world registry data demonstrates that percutaneous implantation of the self-expanding Venus P valve is feasible and safe for RVOT dysfunction, yielding significant functional improvement, though HALT and endocarditis warrant further monitoring.
Background: Self-expandable valves may have a significant impact on the feasibility of transcatheter treatments of RVOT dysfunction. Venus P valve is the first autoexpadable Valve that received CE mark in 2022. Here, we are reporting on a multicenter data collection about patients undergoing Venus P valve implantation in Italy. Materials: Seven italian centers were included in the study. Data were collected from patients treated with a venus P valve between July 2022 and May 2024. Indication for percutaneous valve implantation were in accordance with published guidelines. Results: During the study period, a total of 65 patients were considered eligible to percutaneous implantation of a Venus P valve. Median age at procedure was 35 years (IQR 12-63 years) median weight 63 Kg (IQR 33-103 Kg). Indication for PPVI was severe regurgitation in all subjects but one where ventricular pressure was increased because of stenosis on a homograft conduit and pulmonary arteries which needed previous bilateral stenting. Venus P valve was implanted successfully in 61/65(94 %) patients. Four procedural complications occurred(6 %): 1 artero-venous fistula, 1 pulmonary bleeding, 1 hemothorax and a pulmonary oedema. During follow up (median 13 months,1-20months), all patients experienced a significant improvement of functional class. Neither deaths or re-intervention occurred. CT Scan showed hypoattenuating leaflet thickness (HALT) in 4 patients and one of them experienced endocarditis 12 months after the procedure. Conclusions: Our study shows that Venus P valve implantation is safe and results are stable during a short-to-medium term follow-up. Endocarditis and HALT are inducing some concern and larger studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pilati et al. (2025) conducted an observational in RVOT dysfunction (n=65). Venus P valve implantation was evaluated on Successful implantation. Venus P valve implantation was successful in 94% (61/65) of patients with RVOT dysfunction, with no deaths or re-interventions occurring during a median 13-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: