Why the study?
Does a new optimal bipolar chest lead (R-lead) improve R-wave amplitude compared to standard leads in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=229)
Does a new optimal bipolar chest lead (R-lead) improve R-wave amplitude compared to standard leads in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 2562% vs 2420%
p-value: p=<0.001
A newly derived optimal bipolar chest lead (R-lead) significantly improves R-wave amplitude compared to standard leads, potentially enhancing automated R-wave detection in ambulatory ECG monitors.
May enhance automated detection in ambulatory ECG; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
In this study we aim to determine, from body surface potential map (BSPM) data, the optimal bipolar chest electrode placement for maximum R-wave amplitude. The study data consisted of 117-lead 352-node BSPM data recorded from 229 healthy subjects. The dataset was split into a training set of 172 subjects and a testing set of the remaining 57 subjects. Optimal electrode placement was determined using a lead selection method based on the difference in R-wave amplitude across all 352 nodes for each patient. R-wave values were then extracted and used to create a median BSPM of the training data. From this median BSPM the optimal electrode placement was defined as the location of the minimum and maximum Rwave values. On the testing dataset this new optimal bipolar chest lead (R-lead) was then compared to all of the leads of the Mason-Likar 12-lead ECG and previously described bipolar chest leads, CM5, CS5, CC5 and CB5. The R-lead showed significant improvement in median R-wave amplitude over the next best lead, CM5 (2562 vs. 2420V, Wilcoxon sign ranked test, p<0.001). Given the improvement in signal strength, an improvement in automated R-wave detection and R-R interval analysis from single lead ECG monitors may be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennedy et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=229). R-lead (optimal bipolar chest lead) vs. CM5 lead was evaluated on Median R-wave amplitude (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: