Randomized trial evaluates financial viability of plum farming and identifies barriers in Himachal Pradesh, implying potential for economic growth.
Background Despite the significance of plum cultivation in Himachal Pradesh, there are limited studies that have analyzed its economic viability at the farm level, particularly in Himachal Pradesh. The study addresses this gap by evaluating financial feasibility of plum production and identifying constraints faced by growers in production and marketing in the state. Methods A survey was conducted using a sample of 60 farmers randomly selected from major plum-growing panchayats in the Kullu and Naggar blocks of Kullu district in Himachal Pradesh. Financial indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (B:C ratio), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and sensitivity analysis were used. Results The financial feasibility of the crop in the study region revealed payback period to be 7 years. The benefit–cost ratio was calculated to be 2.17, the internal rate of return (IRR) was 33 per cent, and the net present value was Rs. 448257.77. Sensitivity analysis for a rise in cost of 5 to 10 per cent does not render cultivation uneconomic, since viable measurements are well within the range with modest changes in magnitude. Similarly, a 5 to 10 per cent drop in returns has little effect on economic feasibility. At the overall level, Net present value ranged between Rs. 365018.01 to Rs. 887369.42, the benefit cost ratio ranged between 1.95 and 2.35, and IRR ranged between 30 to 31 per cent at discount rates of 5 and 10 per cent. Discussion/Conclusion The results show that plum investment is resistant to changes in costs and returns. Fertilizer, Farm Yard Manure (FYM) and PPCs significantly affected production but labour was not found significant. The study also found that Fertilizer, FYM, PPCs were discovered to be under-utilized resources and increase in their use will increase production. However, labour was determined to be overutilized, and decrease in its use is needed to increase plum production in study region. Findings also emphasized the necessity for effective management of resources to foster growth in plum cultivation and boost productivity, which can lead to more sustainable farming practices and improved economic outcomes for farmers. The research concluded plum to be a financially viable crop, despite the fact that labor shortages during peak hours and poor storage facilities mostly hindered plum production and commercialization. This demonstrates the urgent need for cold storage facilities and farm mechanization techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kharayat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: