Case report demonstrates catch-up growth in a child with ARS and GHD after GH therapy, suggesting a need for monitoring.
Background Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS) is a multisystem disorder primarily caused by PITX2 mutations. While eye and dental anomalies are classic, the role of PITX2 as a dosage-sensitive regulator of the human growth axis remains clinically under-recognized. We aim to elucidate the link between large-scale 4q25 microdeletions and severe growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Methods A 5.4-year-old boy with ocular segment dysgenesis and short stature underwent family-based whole-exome sequencing (WES). Standardized growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests and longitudinal growth dynamics analysis based on 44 precise clinical data points collected from birth to age 7.45 years were performed. A systematic literature review of 10 ARS cases with growth failure was conducted to propose a pathogenic model. Results WES identified a novel de novo 3.824Mb heterozygous deletion at 4q25 (arr[GRCh38] 4q25(108,929,697–112,753,289)×1), encompassing critical genes including CFI , EGF , PITX2 , PANCR , and LARP7 . Our systematic review revealed a dosage-sensitive correlation between the microdeletion scale at the 4q25 region and the severity of growth axis impairment. The patient exhibited complete GHD (peak GH: 4.22 ng/mL) and a 1.5-year bone age delay. Following 20 months of PEG-rhGH therapy, the patient achieved a significant catch-up growth with a cumulative height gain of 16.5 cm, with his height standard deviation score (Ht-SDS) improving from −2.0 SD to within the normal range. Our mechanistic model suggests that PITX2 haploinsufficiency disrupts the POU1F1 (Pit-1) transcriptional cascade, leading to pituitary hypoplasia. Conclusion This study reports the one of the most extensive longitudinal follow-up of successful PEG-rhGH therapy in ARS to date. We propose that large 4q25 deletions represent a high-risk genotype for GHD. Mandatory growth monitoring and early endocrine screening are recommended for ARS patients with chromosomal deletions in this region to optimize developmental outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: