Cross-sectional survey examines guideline development practices in out-of-hospital health settings, indicating areas for improvement.
OBJECTIVE: Health guidelines are commonly used by clinicians that practice in the out-of-hospital setting (paramedics, emergency medical technicians, and first responders) to inform clinical decision-making. The specific development techniques used to generate these documents however is currently unclear. To address this, we conducted an anonymous online cross-sectional survey of developers of out-of-hospital health guidelines to determine how current practices compare with guidance contained within the Guidelines International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This survey was comprised of binary and open-ended questions that were based upon the 18 topics and 146 steps contained within the GIN-McMaster GDC. Following data collection, we performed a qualitative content analysis which involved grouping responses into categories based on the observed similarities and differences. RESULTS: A total of 104 developers of out-of-hospital guidelines completed the survey, with 34% (35/104) reporting familiarity with the GIN-McMaster GDC and 8% (8/104) having used this resource during guideline development. Overall, 61% (63/104) of respondents reported developing guidelines de novo, while 48% (50/104) and 40% (42/104) had used adaptation and adoption techniques. When developing recommendations, most respondents reported using standardised wording (78/104, 75%), including the certainty of evidence (61/104, 59%), and the strength of the recommendation (60/104, 58%). Conversely, only a small proportion of respondents reported monitoring how recommendations were applied in practice (46/104, 44%), creating performance measures or quality indicators (34/104, 33%), and pilot testing with end-users prior to implementation (25/104, 24%). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional survey, we describe how the current practices of developers of out-of-hospital health guidelines align with the GIN-McMaster GDC. This information will be used to inform the development of a contextualised extension of this checklist to strengthen guideline development processes in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schultz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: