Quality improvement project enhances leadership skills in bedside nurses, suggesting value in development programs.
Introduction: Informal clinical nurse leaders, bedside nurses without formal training and authority who influence their peers, are essential to quality care and team functioning, yet often lack structured leadership preparation. A needs assessment of a unit coordinating council in a 37-bed cardiovascular progressive care unit identified gaps in leadership confidence, leadership competencies, and change management skills. Purpose: This quality improvement project aimed to increase the intrinsic leadership capability and preparation among unit-based informal nurse leaders through a structured development cohort. Methods: Based on the theoretical framework of partnership, a three-month cohort intervention was implemented at a large Midwestern academic medical center. The program included three didactic sessions aligned with American Organization for Nursing Leadership “Leader Within” competencies, individualized mentoring, and visual cue reinforcement. Using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, the curriculum was co-developed with participants. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed self-reported leadership identity, knowledge, confidence, and application. Results: Eight participants completed the project. Mean scores from pre and post Likert questions improved across all domains, with the largest increase in competency identification. Neutral responses were largely eliminated post-intervention in favor of positive results. Qualitative leadership findings shifted from relational descriptions of leadership to systems-level influence, change management, and accountability. Conclusion: A cohort-based leadership development model was associated with self-reported improved leadership confidence, knowledge, and application among informal nurse leaders. Collectively, these findings suggest that intentional, unit-based leadership development initiatives provide measurable value for informal nurse leaders at the bedside.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: