Methods note advocates for coverage audits in localization claims, suggesting improved accuracy of interpretability measures.
A Mercury methods note arguing that sparse probing, activation patching, subspace intervention, and pruning claims should report a coverage audit before making broad localization claims. The audit uses 19 fullgrid manifests and shows a 1/7 pass rate for older sparse or coarse protocols versus 12/12 for per-channel quantile dense runs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho Yiing Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: