This work explores negotiation models used by Latin American states to decrease violence by organized criminal groups, suggesting effective strategies and implications.
Key Points
This research aims to understand how Latin American states negotiate with organized criminal groups to mitigate violence.
Analyzed historical cases in El Salvador, Mexico, Colombia, Honduras, and the United States.
Theorized three negotiation models: crackdown, bribery, and legitimate negotiation.
Assessed correlations between corruption, violence levels, state capacity, and organized criminal group capabilities.
Countries with high enforcement capabilities favor a crackdown approach.
High corruption levels lead to increased bribery negotiations.
States with medium enforcement capacities are more likely to engage in legitimate negotiations.