Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combined experimental and computational study investigates electrolyte performance in supercapacitors, suggesting implications for energy storage efficiency.
Weakly coordinating solvents can be used as solvents to promote the reduction in insertion energy of alkaline cations into the graphite anode of supercapacitors, thereby speeding up charging at low temperatures. We investigate the thermophysical properties of sodium-based electrolytes (NaPF 6 and NaTFSI) composed of propylene carbonate (PC) and the weakly coordinating solvent cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME). The solvent characteristics related to the charge-storage process in supercapacitors are also examined through a combination of electrochemical and computational analyses. The addition of CPME to the electrolytes decreases the viscosity, thus increasing the diffusion coefficients of ions, but decreases their ionic conductivities due to an increase in ion-pair formation, particularly in the presence of NaPF 6 . According to the electrochemical findings, the latter salt exhibits the worst supercapacitor performance among the electrolytes investigated. For the NaTFSI-PC:CPME electrolyte, there is evidence of a Faradaic process, probably due to the solid-state redox insertion/intercalation process occurring in the small number of graphitic domains of the activated carbon electrode. The occurrence of electrolyte degradation was also investigated. The highest specific power and energy were verified for the NaTFSI-PC electrolyte. The Ragone plot calculated from Molecular Dynamics simulations shows excellent agreement with the experimental counterparts. Upon charging the electrodes, CPME leaves the pores, whereas PC follows the flux of . The addition of CPME in the electrolytes increases the contribution of the counter-ion adsorption charging mechanism, which is almost exclusive in NaPF 6 -PC:CPME. Inside the positive porous electrodes, there is a high degree of ionic pairs or aggregates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaccarelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: