Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Addendum expands T-scan analysis to 30 seeds per T value, confirming convergence and documenting dispersion findings.
This deposit adds an addendum to the GRU v2.1 paper (10.5281/zenodo.20722690), reporting an expansion of the T-scan multiseed analysis from N=5 to N=30 seeds per T value (T=20, 40, 80), addressing the sample-size limitation noted in Section 3.4 and Appendix E.3 of the main paper. T-scan N=30 results: T=20: ds = 1.0453 ± 0.0370 (N=5 was 1.0621 ± 0.0205) T=40: ds = 1.0228 ± 0.0374 (N=5 was 1.0444 ± 0.0589) T=80: ds = 1.0048 ± 0.0296 (N=5 was 1.0059 ± 0.0147) The oscillatory convergence toward ds=1 with increasing T is confirmed with the larger sample. All three N=30 means fall within the N=5 uncertainty (recommendation: ADDENDUM, not correction). The addendum also documents two honest findings: T=80 dispersion roughly doubles with N=30 (caution against over-interpreting small-sample std), and chi-squared/dof did not improve with more seeds (consistent with the fit-procedure-noise explanation in Appendix E.1). Two outliers documented but not excluded: seed 789 (T=40, already known) and seed 3002 (T=80, new). Contents: the full v2.1 paper (HTML+PDF), the addendum (HTML+PDF), and a complete ZIP (GRU_v2.1.1_FULL.zip) containing the paper, all original scripts and data from v2.1, plus the three new addendum analysis scripts and the N=30 combined results JSON. Author: Alfredo Flores Cornejo, Independent Researcher, Zapopan, Jalisco, México (dr.alfredo.fc@gmail.com) Related: Concept DOI (all versions): 10.5281/zenodo.20352929. Main paper v2.1: 10.5281/zenodo.20722690.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfredo Flores Cornejo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: