Retrospective cohort study identifies non-technical errors contributing to patient death in emergency general surgery, suggesting improvement strategies for safety.
Objective: To characterize the incidence, clinical phase, team responsibility, and behavioral drivers of non-technical errors (NTEs) associated with death in emergency general surgery to inform future NTS improvement strategies. Background Data: Deficiencies in surgical non-technical skills (NTS) contribute substantially to patient harm. Emergency general surgery is common, complex, and high-risk, yet characteristics of NTEs remain unknown. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all emergency general surgical mortalities with an adverse event or area of concern from a national, mandated, peer-reviewed mortality audit (2012–2019). Cases were independently assessed by two reviewers using a validated tool to identify and characterize NTEs. Results: NTEs occurred in 790/1164 (67.9%) deaths, comprising 1053 unique errors. Situational awareness errors occurred most (518/1053, 49.3%), followed by decision-making errors (431/1053, 40.9%). Most errors arose from few recurring behaviors: for situational awareness, failure to recognize clinical signs (92/518, 17.8%), failure to appreciate illness severity (75/518, 14.5%), and missed diagnosis (73/518, 14.1%); for decision-making, failure to initiate appropriate intervention/investigation (99/431, 23%) or incorrect operation performed (71/431, 16.5%). Error distribution differed significantly (χ²=1325, P <0.01), with 947/1053 (89.9%) occurring outside the operating theatre. Surgical teams were responsible for 652/888 (73.4%) single-team errors and 109/116 (94%) multi-team errors; non-surgical teams were responsible for 235/888 (26.5%) single-team errors and 112/116 (96.6%) multi-team errors. Conclusions: NTEs associated with patient death predominantly occurred outside the operating theatre, arose from few recurrent behaviors, and involved surgical and non-surgical teams. Future NTS improvement strategies must extend beyond the theatre, be behaviorally informed, and target all teams involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: