Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pooled analysis reveals lifestyle and adiposity differences among working women in Peru, indicating the need for targeted interventions.
Background/Objectives: Occupation shapes time use, physical demands, stress, and access to health resources, yet it remains an understudied axis of inequality among working women in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed occupational-group disparities in lifestyle behaviors and adiposity levels among Peruvian working women. Methods: We conducted a pooled repeated cross-sectional analysis of ten Peruvian DHS/ENDES rounds from 2014–2019 and 2021–2024 among working women aged 18–49 years. The exposure was standardized occupational group, using professional/technical/managerial workers as the reference. Outcomes included five lifestyle behaviors and four adiposity indicators. Crude models estimated descriptive prevalence ratios (PRs) or beta coefficients; secondary adjusted models included age group, survey year, education, wealth, residence, natural region, and marital status. Results: A total of 40,726 women were included. Agricultural workers showed lower crude prevalences of almost-daily television viewing (PR 0.49; 95% CI 0.47–0.52), current smoking (PR 0.14; 95% CI 0.10–0.19), current alcohol use (PR 0.39; 95% CI 0.36–0.42), and heavy alcohol use (PR 0.17; 95% CI 0.12–0.27); these contrasts attenuated but generally persisted after adjustment. Insufficient fruit and vegetable intake exceeded 87% in all groups. Sales, domestic/household, services, and skilled manual workers had higher adjusted obesity than the reference group, with adjusted PRs ranging from 1.22 to 1.35. Conclusions: Occupation identifies relevant heterogeneity in lifestyle behaviors and adiposity levels among Peruvian working women. Lifestyle and adiposity profiles did not follow a simple social gradient, supporting occupation-specific strategies for noncommunicable disease prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vera-Ponce et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: