Evaluates struvite's effectiveness for phosphorus uptake in ryegrass, indicating its sustainability benefits.
New Zealand grassland systems rely heavily on imported phosphorus (P), yet conventional water‐soluble fertilizers such as single superphosphate are used inefficiently and contribute to legacy P accumulation and water quality risks. Recovered P from wastewater, such as sparingly soluble struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ·6H 2 O), offers a potentially more sustainable alternative. This study evaluated the agronomic effectiveness of struvite compared with superphosphate in two acidic grassland soils with contrasting P retention capacities (12% and 96%). Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) was grown for 3 months under controlled conditions. Treatments included two P sources (struvite and superphosphate) applied at 0, 15, 30, and 60 mg P kg −1 . Measurements included dry matter yield, plant P uptake, relative agronomic effectiveness, and residual soil Olsen‐P. Fertilizer application significantly increased plant growth and P uptake. While dry matter yields were similar between fertilizers, struvite increased plant P uptake by 49% compared with superphosphate across soils and rates. Relative agronomic effectiveness of struvite was greater in the low P retention soil. Olsen‐P concentrations were consistently higher under struvite in both soils. These results indicate that struvite is a viable alternative to superphosphate in acidic grassland soils, particularly in those where high P‐retention limits P availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeLucca-Agrelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: