Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses coal-biomass blend recognition with YOLO models, suggesting improved monitoring methods.
Real-time perception of coal–biomass blending during conveyor-belt transport remains challenging because of local aggregation, particle overlap, and illumination variation. In this study, a laboratory-scale conveyor-belt image dataset covering different coal mass fractions, illumination conditions, and particle sizes was constructed. Whole-image classification, cropped-ROI classification, direct regression, horizontal bounding box (HBB)-based detection, oriented bounding box (OBB)-based detection, and RT-DETR-L detection baselines were compared using YOLO-series and auxiliary models. Coal mass fraction was estimated using a frequency-weighted statistical strategy that converts frame-level predictions into continuous estimates. YOLOv8-cls achieved an average RMSE of 13.98 percentage points (pp), indicating the influence of background interference in whole-image classification. Among HBB models, YOLOv8m achieved the lowest mean RMSE of 6.10 pp but required higher computational cost. Compared with YOLOv8n, YOLOv8n-OBB reduced the average RMSE from 9.02 to 6.90 pp by providing a more compact material-region representation and reducing background redundancy. These results show that OBB representation improves the stability of lightweight models. The proposed method provides a feasible vision-based soft-sensing approach for online trend monitoring of coal–biomass blending under lightweight deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: