Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Video article demonstrates a step-by-step technique for preserving IMV during left hemicolectomy, implying improved outcomes.
Routine ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) during laparoscopic left hemicolectomy is widely practiced but may predispose patients to venous congestion, ischemia, and anastomotic complications, especially in patients with a long remnant sigmoid colon. IMV preservation remains underutilized due to technical difficulty and the absence of standardized guidance. This video article presents a structured, step-by-step technique for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy and IMV preservation in a 64-year-old male with distal transverse colon adenocarcinoma. Key elements include meticulous IMV skeletonization with selective tributary ligation, targeted left colic artery division, and extracorporeal functional end-to-end anastomosis. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative day 3. A 6-month colonoscopy confirmed a well-healed anastomosis without congestion or stricture. IMV-preserving left hemicolectomy is safe, oncologically sound, and technically reproducible. Maintaining venous drainage may reduce anastomotic congestion and support optimal healing, offering meaningful value in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jearanai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: