Retrospective study examines symptoms and treatment outcomes of drug-resistant abdominal tuberculosis in children, suggesting key management insights.
Drug-resistant abdominal tuberculosis (DR-ATB) is suspected in subjects with non-response to standard therapy despite good compliance. Literature is scarce in children. We studied symptoms, yield of investigations, management and outcome of DR-ATB in children. The electronic database of children (<18 years) diagnosed with DR-ATB over last 15 years was analysed retrospectively and clinical profile, investigations, treatment and outcome were noted. Samples were subjected to microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay, culture, second-line drug susceptibility test (SL-DST) by line probe assay and histology. DR-TB was classified as per guidelines. Thirteen girls (median age: 15 years) presented with anorexia (12, 92%), fever (11, 85%), weight-loss (11, 85%), abdominal pain (11, 85%), lump (6, 46%), intestinal obstruction (5, 38%) and perforation (6, 46%). Imaging showed necrotic lymph-nodes (11, 85%), bowel thickening (9, 69%), ascites (8, 62%), omental thickening (5, 38%), visceral involvement (4, 31%) and tubo-ovarian mass (3, 23%). All had multiple site involvement in abdomen and had received anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) previously. Eight (62%) cases had extra-abdominal tuberculosis. Eleven (85%) cases were rifampicin-resistant (one was pre-extensively drug resistant [pre-XDR]) and 1 (7%) case each was isoniazid mono-resistant and probable XDR-TB. ATT was given for 24 (10–42) months, 11 (85%) responded, one succumbed and one was lost to follow-up. Adverse events occurred in five (38%) cases. In conclusion, rifampicin-resistance accounted for 85% of all DR-ATB. Majority of the patients with DR-ATB were adolescent females with past history of ATT, large necrotic lymph-nodes and multiple site involvement in abdomen. Majority showed good response to therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: