Background: The quantitative exposure-response-toxicity relationships for flumatinib have yet to be established in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients. Methods: We investigated associations between steady-state flumatinib plasma concentrations and clinical efficacy/adverse events in CML-CP patients. Results: Flumatinib exposure exhibited dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. In first-line patients, responders achieving major molecular response (MMR) exhibited significantly higher C max _2h (2-hour post-dose concentration) than non-responders (Non-MMR) (127.75± 60.40 vs. 58.29± 30.47 ng/mL; p< 0.001). Similarly, deep molecular response (DMR) responders showed higher C max _2h than Non-DMR patients (134.63± 66.45 vs. 88.87± 47.89 ng/mL; p< 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal C max _2h threshold of > 87.75 ng/mL for MMR (AUC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.78– 0.96) and > 132.0 ng/mL for DMR (AUC=0.79, 95% CI: 0.68– 0.89). In the later-line, the effective treatment group also achieved substantially higher mean C max _2h than the failure group (133.75± 39.02 vs 88.69± 65.07 ng/mL; p< 0.01). Furthermore, the results identified an association between diarrhea and a C min (trough concentration)> 49 ng/mL, as well as between nausea and vomiting and a C max _2h> 126.5 ng/mL. Conclusion: Flumatinib demonstrates exposure-efficacy-toxicity relationships in Chinese patients with CML-CP. These exploratory findings suggest potential concentration thresholds that may inform future therapeutic drug monitoring strategies, pending prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: