This analysis examines Indigenous mobilization dynamics in Ecuador, revealing resistance mechanisms and socio-political implications.
What explains the fall and rise of Ecuadorian Indigenous mobilization from 2006-2021, and how Indigenous peoples, both leaders and non-leaders, understand the dynamics of their movement? This paper specifically examines protests as modalities of resistance and power to make broader claims regarding the movement as a whole. While there are many modes of resistance, protests are a phenomenon that diverse communities and groups within the movement participate in and have frameworks on. I argue that the decrease in protest frequency is rooted, in part, in two distinct factors that Indigenous leaders propose: 1). Political and ideological co-optation; and 2). Political repression. The increase in the number of protests and participants is rooted in cross-sectoral alliances against widely unpopular neoliberal reforms that enabled the movement's resurgence. While many scholars have emphasized the role of highland movements and elites in the Indigenous movement in Ecuador, I seek to examine the perspectives of individuals outside of the Andean leadership, specifically in the Amazon. Understanding protest dynamics in Ecuador requires an analysis of non-Andean, non-leadership beliefs on why individuals protest or not and how they conceptualize the movement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galen Tsongas (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: