Randomized trial evaluates AI platform's impact on oral hygiene in children, suggesting effective health management strategies.
Background Oral health among children in developing countries, including Vietnam, remains a significant public health concern. Innovative approaches leveraging artificial intelligence AI-based digital health platforms may offer effective strategies for managing dental plaque and promoting better oral hygiene behaviors among school-aged children. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-driven oral healthcare platform ( Denti-I Vietnam ) in improving oral hygiene and behavioral outcomes among Vietnamese primary school students. Methods A total of 204 primary school students aged 8–10 years in Hanoi, Vietnam, participated in this experimental study. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 107), which used the AI-driven oral healthcare platform, and a control group (n = 97), which received traditional oral health education via pamphlets. Oral health behaviors, dental plaque levels (Simplified Oral Hygiene Index; OHI-S), and caries indices (dft/DMFT) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention period. Results The intervention group demonstrated a significant reduction in the OHI-S score compared to baseline (2.49 ± 0.60 to 1.70 ± 0.76, p < 0.001), particularly in the debris component, indicating enhanced plaque control. Notable improvements were also observed in oral hygiene behaviors, including increased frequency of toothbrushing before and after breakfast ( p < 0.01) and more frequent parental assistance during brushing ( p = 0.03). Furthermore, parental awareness of dental caries significantly increased in the intervention group ( p = 0.001). Conclusions The AI-driven oral healthcare platform significantly improved both oral hygiene behaviors and plaque control among Vietnamese primary school children. These findings suggest that AI-driven digital health tools can serve as practical and scalable solutions for promoting oral health in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: