Essay explores generative autobiography methods in a surveillance-focused society, suggesting new authorship approaches.
This essay experiments with a life-writing practice composed through hundreds of thousands of handwritten words—‘illuminated manuscripts’ that function as materialised attention and analog self-fashioning technologies. Produced in the shadow of surveillance capitalism and generative AI, these pages stage a counter-practice to extractive, predictive autobiographical automation. By theorising practice, the essay articulates an ethics and aesthetics of bricolage: a method that splices internalised language models, reworks public discourse, and produces countermemory rather than compliant data. In charting how handwriting becomes both method and refusal, I call for generative autobiography whose authority is authenticated by experience; a mode of life writing that resists extraction, embraces regeneration, and treats autobiographical practice as an unpredictable site of future authorship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aaron Greenberg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: