Prospective multicenter study evaluates imatinib CSF concentrations in children with ALL, suggesting need for better CNS-targeted therapies.
Purpose Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and are increasingly incorporated into treatment protocols of Philadelphia chromosome-like (Ph-like, ABL-class) ALL. However, central nervous system (CNS) relapse remains a significant challenge. Imatinib, a first-generation TKI, demonstrates limited CNS penetration in adults, yet data in children are sparse. Methods This prospective, multicenter study investigated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and matched plasma concentrations of imatinib and its primary bioactive metabolite (N-desmethyl-imatinib) in children and young adults with Ph + or Ph-like (ABL-class) ALL. Plasma and CSF samples were analyzed with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess concentrations across compartments and over time. Results Between January 2023 and June 2025, 32 paired plasma and CSF samples were collected from ten patients (range 1–8 samples/patient; median: 3). In total, 78% of plasma imatinib concentrations were above 1,000 ng/mL. On average, plasma imatinib concentrations were 189-fold higher than in CSF (geometric mean ratio, 95% CI: 142–249, p < 0.001), which was even more profound for N-desmethyl-imatinib (geometric mean ratio 273, 95% CI: 218–339, p < 0.001). The highest measured CSF-imatinib concentration was 63 ng/mL. During therapy, both plasma and CSF imatinib concentrations declined at an average of 0.32% per day ( p < 0.001), resulting in stable CSF-to-plasma ratio over a median follow-up of 5.7 months (range: 0–14 months). Conclusion The very low CSF concentrations support the rationale for alternative TKIs with improved CNS distribution in patients at risk of CNS relapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasmussen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: