Quasi-experimental study examines environmental intervention effects on (e-)cigarette use in adolescents, suggesting varying impacts based on context.
INTRODUCTION Adolescents often overestimate peer smoking and vaping, increasing the likelihood of initiation.School environments play a central role in shaping these perceptions.This study therefore aimed to examine whether a schoolbased environmental intervention modifying the school environment can shift adolescents' perceived norms and reduce (e-)cigarette use.METHODS A quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted in three Swiss secondary schools (March-June 2024; baseline n=664; follow-up n=884).The intervention comprised a multi-component environmental approach, including the relocation of designated smoking areas to less visible locations, accompanying signage, improvements to non-smoking areas, and informational posters.Perceived peer (e-)cigarette use, and self-reported (e-)cigarette use were reported through online surveys at baseline and at one month post-intervention.RESULTS Effects varied across schools.In School 1, perceived prevalence of (e-) cigarette use decreased (cigarettes: β= -0.44; 95% CI: -0.68 --0.21; e-cigarettes: β= -0.53; 95% CI: -0.80 --0.25).In School 2, reductions differed by (e-)cigarette use: never and former users reported lower perceived cigarette prevalence at follow-up, whereas occasional and regular users showed no change.Perceived e-cigarette prevalence decreased (β= -0.42; 95% CI: -0.69 --0.15).In School 3, changes varied by (e-)cigarette use, with regular users reporting lower perceived cigarette prevalence (interaction: β= -1.60; 95% CI: -2.75 --0.45).Perceived e-cigarette prevalence did not change.Across schools, the intervention did not affect (e-)cigarette use.CONCLUSIONS A school-based environmental intervention modifying the school environment may influence adolescents' descriptive norms, although effects appear to depend on baseline policies and implementation context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: