Pilot study evaluates AI/ML effectiveness in predicting pressure injuries, suggesting improved accuracy over traditional methods.
BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are a significant and global adverse event impacting an estimated 2.5 million patients per year, costing from $20 900 to $151 700 per pressure injury. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was 2-fold: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models in predicting HAPIs, and (2) to compare that effectiveness with the predictive accuracy of traditional analytic methods. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was performed for this pilot study. A training dataset was created and used for our exploratory evaluation and comparisons between AI/ML models and traditional analytic methods for pressure injury predictive accuracy. RESULTS: While logistic regression provided a reasonable fit and interpretable coefficients, tree-based AI models performed notably better in predicting HAPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI/ML models appears to offer an increase in precision for the identification of patients at risk for developing HAPIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polancich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: