BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are a significant and global adverse event impacting an estimated 2. 5 million patients per year, costing from 20 900 to 151 700 per pressure injury. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was 2-fold: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models in predicting HAPIs, and (2) to compare that effectiveness with the predictive accuracy of traditional analytic methods. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was performed for this pilot study. A training dataset was created and used for our exploratory evaluation and comparisons between AI/ML models and traditional analytic methods for pressure injury predictive accuracy. RESULTS: While logistic regression provided a reasonable fit and interpretable coefficients, tree-based AI models performed notably better in predicting HAPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI/ML models appears to offer an increase in precision for the identification of patients at risk for developing HAPIs.
Polancich et al. (Fri,) studied this question.