Evaluates dose proportionality and food impact on pharmacokinetics in healthy participants, indicating no significant food effect.
Deutetrabenazine is approved as a treatment in adults for tardive dyskinesia and chorea associated with Huntington’s disease. A once-daily tablet (Austedo XR ® Teva) was recently approved in addition to the twice-daily tablet (Austedo ® ), and studies were conducted to evaluate dosage strength proportionality and food effect of the once-daily formulation. In a randomized cross-over study of dosage strength proportionality, healthy participants ( n = 116) received single doses of the once-daily deutetrabenazine formulation and a power model was fitted to describe the relationship between dose and pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum observed plasma drug concentration [ C max ], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 36 h [AUC 0–36h ], and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC 0–∞ ]). In the second cross-over study, a single 24-mg dose of the once-daily formulation was given in fasted and fed conditions to healthy participants ( n = 84) and the effect of food was evaluated by constructing 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for C max , AUC 0– t , and AUC 0–∞. Dosage strength proportionality for the once-daily formulation was demonstrated for the dosage strengths 6 mg, 12 mg, and 24 mg; and across the approved dose range up to 48 mg for the pharmacokinetic parameters of all analytes (deutetrabenazine, and metabolites; deuterated alpha-dihydrotetrabenazine and beta-dihydrotetrabenazine), individually and as a sum). In the food effect study, the C max, AUC 0– t , and AUC 0–∞ geometric mean ratios for deutetrabenazine and deuterated metabolites all fell within the 90% confidence interval of 80–125. The once-daily formulation of deutetrabenazine exhibited dosage strength proportional pharmacokinetics for doses up to 48 mg and there was no observed effect of food.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sunzel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: