Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work investigates black hole interior conditions determining curvature scale effects, suggesting implications for cosmological models.
This work investigates which consequences of regular black hole interiors follow from the curvature scale-setting condition itself and which remain dependent on the selected regularizing mass profile. The transition radius is fixed by imposing the invariant Schwarzschild curvature condition (KSch(rc)=η KP), where (KP=P⁻⁴). This gives (rc∝ M1/3), so the regularization scale is determined before the interior profile is chosen. The paper compares two controlled examples: an exponential regular black hole profile and a Hayward-type profile. Both models use the same exterior Schwarzschild mass, the same curvature threshold parameter, and the same curvature-derived transition radius, but differ in their radial interpolation between the regular center and the Schwarzschild exterior. The analysis separates common consequences of the curvature-derived scale from profile-dependent effects. The common results include the mass scaling of the transition radius, the absence of explicit asymptotic-mass dependence in the normalized curvature profile, the critical-mass scaling (Mₘᵢₙ∝η-1/4MP), the central curvature (K(0)=2η KP), and the Planck-scale large-mass limit of the inner horizon. The profile-dependent results include the critical numerical coefficients, detailed horizon radii, energy-condition transition surfaces, outer-horizon surface-gravity maxima, radial compactness, and the form of the exterior corrections. The supplementary material includes Python scripts, generated numerical data, validation logs, figures, and Lean 4 verification files supporting selected algebraic and formal components of the analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paruzel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: