The Typological Error of the Creator God: A Machine-Verified Metalogical Proof That the Abrahamic God Cannot Exist as Defined

The Typological Error of the Creator God presents a machine-verified metalogical argument demonstrating that the classical Abrahamic conception of God — as the creator of immortal souls and the world ex nihilo — is not false, but typologically incoherent.Using the Coq proof assistant, the paper shows that the predicate "created" can only be meaningfully applied to Objects within a Field of differentiation. Applying it to the immortal soul (a Walker), the Field itself (the world), or a transcendent Subject (God) results in type errors. These are not empirical or theological mistakes, but category mistakes at the level of fundamental ontology.The argument distinguishes three primordial types — Object, Field, and Walker — and concludes that the Abrahamic creator God, as traditionally defined, possesses no coherent function. The paper positions this result as stronger than traditional atheism: the question of such a God’s existence is not merely unanswered, but ill-posed.This work combines insights from analytic philosophy of language, type theory, Madhyamaka Buddhist thought, and performative self-reference to expose a fundamental incoherence in one of Western theology’s central claims.