Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals safety and toxicity profiles of novel immune checkpoint agents in solid tumors, suggesting distinct effects for LAG-3 and TIGIT modulations.
BACKGROUND: : Novel agents targeting immune checkpoints are under development to overcome resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade. Incidences of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and toxicity profiles of novel agents remain unelucidated. METHODS: : We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for clinical trials evaluating agents targeting co-inhibitory (B7-H3, CD47, TIGIT, LAG-3, and TIM-3) or co-stimulatory checkpoints (OX40, 4-1BB, CD27, ICOS, GITR, CD70, and CD40) in solid tumors. Incidences of any-grade and grade 3 to 5 (G3-5) treatment-related AEs (trAEs) and irAEs were extracted from phase 2 and 3 trials, and phase 1/2 trials with safety information reported at the recommended phase 2 dose. Odds ratios (ORs) from two-arm studies evaluating the addition of LAG-3 or TIGIT blockade to control-arm therapy were pooled, and AE incidences across immunotherapy subtypes were reported using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: : A systematic review identified 27 clinical trials comprising 3,946 patients. The addition of LAG-3 blockade increased G3-5 trAEs (OR 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.54, p = 0.001), adrenal insufficiency (G3-5: OR 8.43, 95%CI: 1.04 to 68.37, p = 0.046; any-grade: OR 4.81, 95%CI: 1.81-12.78, p = 0.002) and any-grade arthralgia (OR 2.07, 95%CI: 1.29-3.30, p = 0.002). Adding TIGIT blockade increased any-grade rash (OR 2.32, 95%CI: 1.01 to 5.34, p = 0.048). Meta-analyses revealed varying irAE patterns: G5 trAEs (0.9-2.9%), G3-5 pneumonitis (0.5-5.5%, highest in TIM-3), G3-5 colitis (0.2 to 5.4%, highest in LAG-3), G3-5 hepatitis (1.5-5.5%, highest in TIM-3), G3-5 adrenal insufficiency (1.7 to 8.4%, highest in TIGIT). CONCLUSIONS: : This study highlights the distinct toxicity profiles of novel immunotherapy agents, providing essential safety data to support clinicians as these therapies approach approval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujiwara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: