Evaluates an educational intervention for teaching sex diversity in undergraduate physiology, suggesting transformative potential for future curricula.
This study evaluates an educational intervention using a constructivist guidebook developed by the authors to teach human development and sex diversity within physiology education. Despite scientific advances, tertiary curricula often maintain binary, pathologizing views that overlook biological complexity. We implemented the BioQueer guidebook in a one-group pretest-posttest study with 44 undergraduate students from bachelor's and teacher-education tracks (Licenciate) degree. The intervention focused on the hormonal signaling, and differences of sex development (DSD) as natural physiological variations. Statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed significant perceived learning across all five dimensions (P < 0.0001), with large effect sizes (r ≥ 0.64). Cumulative link models indicated that the material reduced disparities in physiological knowledge regardless of baseline levels, while cumulative learning patterns emerged regarding gender binarism. Bachelor's students showed higher odds of attaining top-tier post-test categories in specific domains. This approach fosters gender literacy without compromising scientific rigor, situating physiological processes within the broader context of natural variability. Promoting such inclusive frameworks is essential for training future professionals to interpret human biology with greater precision and social responsibility. Future longitudinal research is needed to assess the durability of these conceptual shifts in reproductive physiology education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crempe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: