Evaluates drug screening in neuroblastoma using MicroOrganoSphere™ technology, suggesting improved growth and rapid testing timelines.
Background Neuroblastoma is among the most fatal pediatric solid tumors and high-risk patients face poor survival despite intensive treatment. Genomic profiling alone has not translated into effective treatment stratification for all neuroblastoma patients. Drug screening offers a complementary strategy, but conventional preclinical models are constrained by limited establishment success from low-input material and by timelines often incompatible with diagnostic decision-making. Here, we evaluated MicroOrganoSphere™ (MOS™) technology, in which tumor cells are encapsulated in Matrigel droplets generated by microfluidic droplet formation, by a head-to-head comparison with the conventional suspension cultures to improve growth and drug testing in neuroblastoma. Methods MOS™ were established from patient-derived tumoroids, patient-derived xenograft-derived fresh tumors and tumoroids, and a freshly dissociated patient tumor to compare growth and drug responses with suspension. Results Tumor cell growth in MOS™ was comparable or superior to suspension cultures. MOS™ drug screens were performed at a 2.5-fold lower seeding density compared to suspension, whilst maintaining reliable results with consistent drug sensitivity profiles and screen quality to suspension. Promisingly, drug testing in MOS™ was feasible within 9 days of receiving fresh PDX tumor tissue. Conclusion These results demonstrate in a proof-of-concept setting how MOS™ technology could support the establishment and drug screening of neuroblastoma cultures from low-input samples within clinically relevant timelines. MOS™ technology provides a promising functional platform to accelerate preclinical drug testing in neuroblastoma precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoonbeek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from EJC Paediatric Oncology