Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates high lung cancer classification accuracy in CT images, suggesting reliable automated diagnosis.
Background Lung cancer is among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and early detection from CT images is critical for improving patient outcomes. Manual interpretation of CT scans is time-consuming, subjective, and susceptible to inter-observer variability, necessitating automated and reliable computer-aided diagnosis systems. Method This study proposes HALI-Net, a hybrid attention-based deep learning framework for multiclass lung cancer classification from CT scan images. The framework integrates adaptive Gaussian-based preprocessing, handcrafted texture feature extraction using Gray Level Co- occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and Local Binary Pattern (LBP), and deep feature extraction via InceptionV3 enhanced with a Multi-Scale Channel Attention (MSCA) mechanism. A hybrid feature fusion strategy combines deep and handcrafted representations, which are subsequently classified by an MLP classifier. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) is incorporated to provide visual interpretability. The model is evaluated on the IQ-OTH/NCCD lung cancer dataset comprising three diagnostic classes: Benign, Malignant, and Normal. Results HALI-Net achieves a classification accuracy of 98.55%, with strong precision, recall, F1- score, and a ROC-AUC of 99.90%. Ablation studies confirm the individual contribution of each proposed component, and Grad-CAM visualizations demonstrate consistent focus on clinically relevant pulmonary regions across all diagnostic categories. Conclusion The proposed HALI-Net framework delivers an accurate, computationally efficient, and clinically interpretable solution for automated lung cancer detection from CT images. Its hybrid architecture and explainability mechanisms make it well-suited for integration into computer-aided diagnostic workflows in clinical environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmud et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: