Unconditional Proof of the Existence and Mass Gap of Four-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory Abstract This paper presents a rigorous proof of the existence and mass gap of four-dimensional Yang-Mills theory for the compact simple Lie group SU (N) (N ≥ 2), resolving the Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Problem (Jaffe-Witten, 2000). The proof proceeds in four stages. Stage One (Chapters 0–1): Establish the problem statement and the rigorous mathematical foundations of lattice gauge theory. Define the Wilson action and partition function on a finite lattice, prove the absolute convergence of the SU (N) character expansion, and establish the lattice duality identity. Section 1. 4 provides a complete constructive correspondence from representation assignments to string-net configurations, including the rigorous verification of the bijective mapping and weight correspondence. Stage Two (Chapters 2–3): Independently construct the magnetic monopole string-net model. Define the string-net configuration space Ω with Polish topology. Construct the Poisson process measure μ₀ as a reference measure, define the Gibbs measure μₛtring via the Radon-Nikodym derivative e^-E, and prove the existence and uniqueness of the thermodynamic limit. Through low-energy homotopy classification, prove that low-energy states are in one-to-one correspondence with integer partitions, yielding the partition function series representation Z = Σ p (n) e^-Δn. Rigorously prove the upper bound ||δH|| ≤ 3Δ/8 0 is derived. Stage Three (Chapters 4–5): Prove the mass gap. Define the Hamiltonian Hₛtring on the Hilbert space L² (Ω, μₛtring) and prove its self-adjointness. Through the low-energy effective space decomposition Hₑff = ⊕₍=₀∞ Hₙ (dim Hₙ = p (n) ), prove the uniqueness of the ground state (E₀ = 0) and the lower bound E₁ ≥ 3Δ/4 > 0, yielding the string-net mass gap μₛtring ≥ 3Δ/4 > 0. Define the Yang-Mills measure μYM via the continuum limit of the duality map, and prove the transfer of the mass gap μYM = μₛtring ≥ 3Δ/4 > 0. Stage Four (Chapters 6–7): Verify the Osterwalder-Schrader axioms and complete the Minkowski lifting. Prove that μYM satisfies OS1–OS5, analytically continue to Minkowski spacetime via the OS reconstruction theorem, and verify all Wightman axioms. This proof is completely independent of lattice gauge theory numerical simulations and perturbative expansions, relying solely on standard mathematical tools: functional analysis, probability theory (Kolmogorov extension theorem, Prokhorov theorem), representation theory (Peter-Weyl theorem, Weyl character formula, Schur-Weyl theorem), differential geometry (Frobenius theorem, Uhlenbeck compactness theorem), and number theory (Hardy-Ramanujan formula). Keywords: Yang-Mills theory; mass gap; Wilson-'t Hooft duality; magnetic monopole string-net; integer partitions; Osterwalder-Schrader axioms; Wightman axioms References 1 Jaffe, A. , & Witten, E. (2000). Quantum Yang-Mills theory. *Clay Mathematics Institute*. 2 Wilson, K. G. (1974). Confinement of quarks. *Phys. Rev. D*, 10, 2445–2459. 3 't Hooft, G. (1978). On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement. *Nucl. Phys. B*, 138, 1–25. 4 Osterwalder, K. , & Schrader, R. (1973). Axioms for Euclidean Green's functions I. *Comm. Math. Phys. *, 31, 83–112. 5 Osterwalder, K. , & Schrader, R. (1975). Axioms for Euclidean Green's functions II. *Comm. Math. Phys. *, 42, 281–305. 6 Hardy, G. H. , & Ramanujan, S. (1918). Asymptotic formulae in combinatory analysis. *Proc. London Math. Soc. *, Ser. 2, 17 (1), 75–115. 7 Goddard, P. , Nuyts, J. , & Olive, D. (1977). Gauge theories and magnetic charge. *Nucl. Phys. B*, 125, 1–28. 8 Uhlenbeck, K. K. (1982). Connections with Lᵖ bounds on curvature. *Comm. Math. Phys. *, 83, 31–42. 9 Glimm, J. , & Jaffe, A. (1987). *Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point of View*. Springer-Verlag. 10 Reed, M. , & Simon, B. (1980). *Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis* (2nd ed. ). Academic Press. 11 Savit, R. (1980). Duality in field theory and statistical systems. *Rev. Mod. Phys. *, 52 (2), 453–487. 12 Harish-Chandra. (1958). Spherical functions on a semisimple Lie group I. *American Journal of Mathematics*, 80 (2), 241–310. 13 Seiberg, N. , & Witten, E. (1994). Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. *Nucl. Phys. B*, 426, 19–52. 14 Witten, E. (1982). An SU (2) anomaly. *Phys. Lett. B*, 117, 324–328. 15 Seeley, R. T. (1967). Complex powers of an elliptic operator. *Proc. Symp. Pure Math. *, 10, 288–307. 16 Weyl, H. (1925). Theorie der Darstellung kontinuierlicher halbeinfacher Gruppen durch lineare Transformationen. *Math. Z. *, 23, 271–309. 17 Peter, F. , & Weyl, H. (1927). Die Vollständigkeit der primitiven Darstellungen einer geschlossenen kontinuierlichen Gruppe. *Math. Ann. *, 97, 737–755. 18 Fulton, W. , & Harris, J. (1991). *Representation Theory: A First Course*. Springer. 19 Simon, B. (1996). *Representations of Finite and Compact Groups*. American Mathematical Society. 20 Kallenberg, O. (2002). *Foundations of Modern Probability* (2nd ed. ). Springer. 21 Billingsley, P. (1999). *Convergence of Probability Measures* (2nd ed. ). Wiley. 22 Gilkey, P. B. (1995). *Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem* (2nd ed. ). CRC Press. 23 Wehrheim, K. (2004). *Uhlenbeck Compactness*. EMS Series of Lectures in Mathematics. 24 Kobayashi, S. , & Nomizu, K. (1963). *Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. I*. Interscience. 25 Abramowitz, M. , & Stegun, I. A. (1964). *Handbook of Mathematical Functions*. National Bureau of Standards. 26 Andrews, G. E. (1976). *The Theory of Partitions*. Addison-Wesley. 27 Evans, L. C. (2010). *Partial Differential Equations* (2nd ed. ). American Mathematical Society. 28 Palais, R. S. (1968). *Foundations of Global Non-Linear Analysis*. Benjamin. 29 Osterwalder, K. , & Seiler, E. (1978). Gauge field theories on a lattice. *Annals of Physics*, 110 (2), 440–471. 30 Bratteli, O. , & Robinson, D. W. (1997). *Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics II* (2nd ed. ). Springer. 31 Streater, R. F. , & Wightman, A. S. (1964). *PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That*. Benjamin. 32 't Hooft, G. (1976). Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies. *Phys. Rev. Lett. *, 37, 8–11. Author Information: Qin ZitaiORCID: 0009-0004-5467-0074 Date: June 20, 2026 Unconditional Proof MSC Classification: 81T13, 81T08, 81T17, 81T25, 81T27, 47B37, 81T80
子泰 秦 (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: