Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Audit note reveals new insights into baryon composites, decay processes, and particle identities.
Audit note. This paper predates the framework's methodology audit of 2026-05-30. The baryon sector is now characterised at §15 item 142 as ``De Rújula--Georgi--Glashow constituent quark model in substrate clothing'' --- one mass per heavy quark flavour as Target B, same wins (equal-spacing parameter-free across J = 3/2 rows) and same bounded limitations (|ψ(0)|^2 non-universality saturating at ~\!25% by charm scale) as the standard constituent-quark-model treatment. The framing of baryon composites as single-error states of the [8,4,4] code (this paper's central content) survives as structural reformulation; the implied ``zero-parameter'' framing of any downstream mass predictions should be read in the post-audit sense (one parameter per heavy quark flavour). See ANCHOR §15 item 142 for the full sector-scope statement. We extend the circlette lattice model to composite particles. The XOR composite of any colour-neutral baryon is an invalid codeword at Hamming distance 1 from a lepton; beta decay is the lattice correcting this error via the weak CNOT gate. We prove a zero-sum identity: the bitwise XOR of all particles in beta decay vanishes identically, sector by sector. Three predictions follow: (i) the W- boson is the literal XOR differential d+u=00000100; (ii) the neutrino is a Majorana fermion; (iii) proton stability follows from the CNOT gate's inability to flip its own control bit. 2026-06-20 legacy canon revision: This is a canon-reconciled legacy version. Early part-series matter note; needs canon alignment The paper retains its historical derivation trail but carries a 2026-06-20 canon revision note identifying current status and superseded claims. 2026-06-21 canon refresh: This version incorporates the 2026-06-21 ANCHOR/DRIFT/PTMS canon refresh and rebuilt local PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. G. Elliman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: