Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates increased dapivirine release rates in HIV prevention implants, suggesting feasibility for future studies.
Dapivirine (DPV) is an antiretroviral drug used for prevention of sexually acquired HIV infection in the form of a monthly matrix-type silicone elastomer vaginal ring. As part of efforts to develop longer acting antiretroviral products for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), we previously reported reservoir-type DPV-releasing silicone elastomer subdermal implants. These early prototypes were constrained by relatively low DPV daily release rates (7–14 µg/day), which are likely too low to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. Here, we report in vitro formulation development next-generation implant formulations as part of efforts to increase DPV release rates. Three strategies were evaluated—(i) reservoir-type implants fabricated from medical-grade silicone tubing comprising a core containing DPV solubilised in a liquid polyethoxylated castor oil (Kolliphor® EL), (ii) dip-coated reservoir rods, comprising a matrix-type silicone core and a relatively thin (∼0.33–0.66 mm) drug-free, silicone elastomer, rate-controlling membrane applied by dip coating, and (iii) simple matrix-type silicone elastomer rods. Replacing the conventional silicone elastomer core of the implants with Kolliphor® EL increased DPV solubility and enhanced steady-state flux ∼ 1.5-fold. Dip-coated implants provided mean daily release rates of 19–41 µg/day. Matrix-type implants lacking a rate-controlling membrane delivered up to 185 µg/day. While these release rates represent a substantial improvement over first-generation devices, it remains uncertain whether they would produce systemic concentrations sufficient for HIV prevention, given dapivirine’s relatively low potency and the absence of a local delivery advantage with subdermal administration. Nonetheless, the findings are useful in demonstrating the feasibility of designing silicone-based implants, illustrating how core composition, membrane geometry, and release conditions influence DPV release from silicone subdermal implants, and providing a basis for future in vivo pharmacokinetic and preclinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: