Derives Planck mass from holographic self-consistency in a lattice, resolving cosmological constant issues.
Audit note. This paper derives the Planck mass via holographic self-consistency between 4.8.8 node geometry and the Friedmann equation, yielding M_P^2 = 24πα^2ΛQCD^3/(H_0Ω_Λ) at 0.07% numerical agreement with CODATA. The exact algebraic theorems of §§2--4 (silver-ratio area cancellation, Euler-characteristic flatness, holographic trap identity) are immune to formula-freedom audit. However, the gravitationally active vacuum energy Evacᵍʳᵃᵛ = 3/4α^2Λ derived in §6 is assembled post-hoc from three independently motivated but phenomenologically coupled parameters (Svac from Part 16, a structural fraction 3/4 from R1--R4 counting, and a radiative-coupling factor α⁻¹) into a screening factor S = 458.15. The walk-operator self-energy derivation of S from first principles is currently open. Per t The Planck mass follows from holographic self-consistency: M_P^2 = 24*pi*alpha^2*Lambda_QCD^3 / (H0*Omega_Lambda), yielding M_P=1.2217e19 GeV (0.07% error). The vacuum energy density rho_Lambda=9*alpha^2*Lambda_QCD^3*H0 matches observation exactly, resolving the cosmological constant problem. The 4.8.8 tiling has zero Euler characteristic, making spatial flatness topologically inevitable. v2.0 (2026-06-12): an in-PDF dated status/erratum note has been added reflecting the June 2026 canon audit (DRIFT/ANCHOR ledger); see the paper's status note for the specific corrections, supersessions, or upgrades. 2026-06-20 legacy canon revision: This is a canon-reconciled legacy version. Planck-mass route superseded by proton-primary/selector analysis The paper retains its historical derivation trail but carries a 2026-06-20 canon revision note identifying current status and superseded claims. 2026-06-21 canon refresh: This version incorporates the 2026-06-21 ANCHOR/DRIFT/PTMS canon refresh and rebuilt local PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. G. Elliman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: