Key result
Pacemaker implantations in Fyn county, Denmark, showed a steadily increasing prevalence from 1964 to 1990, projected to reach up to 3.1 per 1,000 persons within the next 25 years.
Why the study?
What are the incidence, prevalence, and mortality trends of pacemaker implantations in Fyn County, Denmark?
Observational
What are the incidence, prevalence, and mortality trends of pacemaker implantations in Fyn County, Denmark?
The prevalence of pacemaker patients in Denmark is projected to steadily increase and plateau at around 3 per 1,000 persons due to rising incidence and stable mortality.
Throughout the last three decades the number of patients with pacemakers has increased. Registers of pacemakers and pacemaker patients have been established to monitor, for example, the battery life expectancy and patient data. We have analyzed the registry for Fyn county, Denmark, which includes data on incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates among patients with pacemakers during the period from 1964 to 1990. The analyses show that the prevalence rate is steadily increasing as a result of a combination of an increasing incidence rate and a stable mortality rate among the pacemaker patients. Based on the development in the first almost 30 years of pacemaker implantations, two trends of the future prevalence of pacemaker patients are projected. Provided constant mortality rates and expected incidence rates of 300 per million person years and 350 per million person years, respectively, the prevalence will reach a plateau of 2.7 per 1,000 persons and 3.1 per 1,000 persons, respectively, within the next 25 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (1991) conducted an observational in Pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates. Pacemaker implantations in Fyn county, Denmark, showed a steadily increasing prevalence from 1964 to 1990, projected to reach up to 3.1 per 1,000 persons within the next 25 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: