Key result
Updated pathway-based framework standardizes pericardial disease diagnosis and management around 5 key clinical scenarios.
This paper provides a reproducible, pathway-based clinical framework designed to standardize the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases across multidisciplinary teams.
May support standardized pericardial disease care; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic precision and outcomes.
Pericardial disease represents a diverse clinical spectrum, including acute pericarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, effusive-constrictive pericarditis, and constrictive pericarditis, which vary significantly in presentation, urgency, and management. Recent consensus guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology have enhanced clinical phenotyping, multimodal imaging techniques, and targeted immunomodulatory therapies; however, their implementation in clinical practice remains variable. We introduce our updated pathway-based framework that structures diagnosis and treatment around five key clinical scenarios: chest pain, hemodynamic collapse, dyspnea, incidental pericardial effusion, and right-sided heart failure. Each scenario guides a systematic process of risk stratification, tiered diagnostic evaluation, and phenotype-specific therapy. In cases of acute pericarditis, management employs a three-tier escalation approach, with interleukin-1 inhibitors (rilonacept, anakinra) as the preferred escalation for inflammatory phenotypes unresponsive to NSAIDs and colchicine. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is integral to phenotyping, utilizing late gadolinium enhancement and T2-STIR sequences to inform treatment escalation. Management of pericardial effusion is standardized through a validated drainage scoring system that considers etiology, size, and echocardiographic hemodynamics. Constrictive pericarditis is classified into three subtypes: transient/inflammatory, effusive-constrictive, and chronic/fixed, each with a distinct management pathway, reserving surgical pericardiectomy at specialized centers for fibrotic or medically refractory cases. This pathway consolidates current evidence into a reproducible clinical framework designed to standardize care, enhance diagnostic precision, and facilitate shared decision-making among multidisciplinary pericardial disease teams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivalokanathan et al. (2026) conducted a review in Pericardial disease. Pathway-based framework was evaluated. An updated pathway-based framework structures the diagnosis and management of pericardial disease around five key clinical scenarios to standardize care and enhance diagnostic precision.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: