Cardiovascular Health among Young Adults: Do Childhood Neighborhoods Matter?

Figures

• 

  Fig. 1. Radar charts of neighborhood archetypes identified by latent class analysis on contextual variables. Larger values indicate a greater probability that individuals in the given archetype (Advantaged, Disadvantaged, and Most Disadvantaged) are in the half of the distribution of the contextual variable associated with greater CVH vulnerability (e.g., higher poverty, lower education). Note: Detailed descriptions of the contextual variables and the associated probabilities by archetype are available in Appendix Table 1.

• 

  Fig. 2. Neighborhood transition probabilities between Year 0 and Year 9 (n = 1182).

• 

  Fig. 3. Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals representing associations between young adult CVH scores and childhood neighborhood archetypes, stayers and movers. Coefficients are based on Model 2 (unadjusted for sociodemographic factors) and Model 3 (adjusted for sociodemographic factors) in Table 3. Advantaged (A) stayers are the reference group. A: Advantaged, D: Disadvantaged, MD: Most disadvantaged.

• 

  Fig. 4. Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals representing associations between young adult cardiovascular health behaviors and childhood neighborhood archetypes, stayers and movers. Adjusted models include individual-level sociodemographic factors. Full model output is available in Appendix Tables 2a and 2b Advantaged (A) stayers are the reference group. A: Advantaged, D: Disadvantaged, MD: Most disadvantaged.

• 

  Fig. 5. Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals representing associations between young adult clinical cardiovascular health measures and childhood neighborhood archetypes, movers and stayers. Adjusted models include individual-level sociodemographic factors. Full model output is available in Appendix Tables 2c and 2d Advantaged (A) stayers are the reference group. A: Advantaged, D: Disadvantaged, MD: Most disadvantaged.