Key result
Low dietary inflammatory index and high physical activity linked to synergistically lower systemic inflammation post-MI.
Why the study?
Does low dietary inflammatory potential and high physical activity adherence reduce systemic inflammation in post-myocardial infarction patients?
Cohort (n=1,700)
No
Does low dietary inflammatory potential and high physical activity adherence reduce systemic inflammation in post-myocardial infarction patients?
Low dietary inflammatory potential and high physical activity adherence synergistically predict lower systemic inflammation in post-MI patients.
Low DII and high PA were associated with lower inflammation post-MI; hypothesis-generating for combined lifestyle interventions.
Background After a myocardial infarction (MI), one of the major factors responsible for bad outcomes is systemic inflammation. It is known that diet and physical activity (PA) have separate effects on inflammation, but it is still unclear what the combined effects are in patients who have already suffered a heart attack. Methods Over 6 months, 1,700 post-MI patients in this retrospective cohort study were monitored. The validated questionnaires assessed dietary intake and physical activity adherence, and patients were classified by DII (high vs. low) and PA adherence (high vs. low). Important biomarkers included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- α ), and a composite inflammation score. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results The group of patients classified as having low DII and high PA, showed the least amount of inflammation (hs-CRP: 2.31 ± 1.12 mg/L; IL-6: 3.8 ± 1.4 pg./mL; TNF- α : 4.7 ± 1.7 pg./mL; composite score: −0.72 ± 0.55), while the group with high DII and low PA ( n = 470) exhibited inflammation at its highest level (hs-CRP: 4.89 ± 2.05 mg/L; IL-6: 6.4 ± 2.3 pg./mL; TNF- α : 7.1 ± 2.5 pg/mL; composite score: +0.89 ± 0.74; p < 0.001). The multivariable analysis provided evidence of independent relationships between DII ( β = +0.18; p < 0.001) and PA ( β = −0.14; p < 0.001) and the composite inflammation score, as well as a notable interaction effect ( β = −0.07; p = 0.001). Conclusion The dietary inflammatory potential and PA adherence of the patients, both independently and in combination, could predict the level of systemic inflammation in post-MI patients. These findings support lifestyle interventions as the primary component of post-MI secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in post-myocardial infarction (n=1,700). Low Dietary Inflammatory Index and High Physical Activity vs. High Dietary Inflammatory Index and Low Physical Activity was evaluated on Composite inflammation score (per 1-unit increase in DII) (β +0.18, 95% CI 0.12-0.24, p=<0.001). A low dietary inflammatory index and high physical activity synergistically reduced the composite inflammation score (Δ -0.64) over 6 months in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: