Key result
First M-wave in a 10-Hz paired pulse accurately estimates sarcolemmal excitability versus single stimulation.
Why the study?
Does paired stimulation provide a reliable estimate of sarcolemmal excitability compared to single stimulation in young healthy men?
Does paired stimulation provide a reliable estimate of sarcolemmal excitability compared to single stimulation in young healthy men?
When using 10-Hz paired stimuli to assess peripheral adjustments, single stimulations may be unnecessary for evaluating sarcolemmal excitability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-pulse stimulation may be unnecessary with 10-Hz pairs for sarcolemmal excitability; leaves open validation beyond healthy cohorts.
PURPOSE: In exercising humans, contractility is usually investigated using paired/tetanic transcutaneous electrically-evoked contraction, while single stimulations are used to quantify sarcolemmal excitability through M-wave amplitude. Here, we aim at investigating the reliability and validity of M-wave peak-to-peak amplitude and first phase amplitude obtained from paired stimulation compared to those obtained from single stimulation (gold standard) before and after a sustained submaximal isometric contraction of the knee extensor, plantar flexor, elbow flexor and thumb adductor muscles. METHODS: M waves, in response to single and paired (10 Hz and 100 Hz) stimuli, were collected in thirteen young, healthy men (25 ± 2 year) before and immediately after an isometric contraction sustained at 50% maximal voluntary force until failure. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was used to measure the reliability of M-wave parameters obtained from single and paired stimuli. RESULTS: Variability in the changes in M-wave amplitude was observed following exercise depending on the muscle considered and underscores the need to analyze both phases of the M wave. This study also demonstrates that the M-wave elicited by the first stimulation in a 10-Hz (as opposed to 100-Hz) paired pulse provides an accurate and reliable estimate of sarcolemmal excitability under both resting and fatigued conditions across all investigated muscles. CONCLUSION: When using 10-Hz paired stimuli to assess peripheral adjustments, single stimulations may be unnecessary for evaluating sarcolemmal excitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanfranchi et al. (2026) studied Healthy (n=13). Paired stimulation (10 Hz and 100 Hz) vs. Single stimulation was evaluated on Reliability of M-wave parameters (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient). The M-wave elicited by the first stimulation in a 10-Hz paired pulse provides an accurate and reliable estimate of sarcolemmal excitability compared to single stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: