Key result
Metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity linked to ~68% higher odds of ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
Does metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease and MASLD compared to healthy normal weight lean subjects?
Cohort (n=121,586)
Does metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease and MASLD compared to healthy normal weight lean subjects?
Odds Ratio: 1.68 (95% CI 1.36–2.05)
p-value: p=FDR=0.000007
Metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity is associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, whereas metabolically healthy normal weight obesity does not show these increased risks, highlighting the importance of metabolic risk factors in normal weight individuals.
BACKGROUND: Normal weight obesity (NWO) is characterized by a normal body mass index (BMI) and elevated body fat. Heterogeneous risk has been observed in people with obesity (BMI > 30) when considering metabolic risk factors (MRFs) such as high C-reactive protein, low-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C, triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein. OBJECTIVES: We assessed heterogeneity between metabolically healthy (MH) and metabolically unhealthy (MU) subjects with NWO in relation to (1) incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) along with (2) changes in heart physiology, liver function (assessed with imaging), and cardiometabolic/liver serum biomarkers. METHODS: In total, 121,586 subjects were classified into the following experimental groups: a healthy normal weight lean reference group ( ≤ 2 MRFs), MH-NWO ( ≤ 2 MRFs), MU-NWO ( > 2 MRFs), and people with overweight/obesity (OW/O) were classified as MH-OW/O ( ≤ 2 MRFs) or MU-OW/O ( > 2 MRFs). Primary outcomes were incident CVD and MASLD analyzed using Firth logistic regression and displayed via odds ratios (OR) and 95%-confidence intervals (95%-CI). Secondary outcomes were cross-sectional cardiac/liver imaging, serum liver enzyme, and lipid biomarkers analyzed using quantile regression. Results were deemed significant at false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. RESULTS: MU-NWO had higher odds of ischemic heart disease (OR 1.68, 95%-CI 1.36-2.05, FDR = 0.000007), myocardial infarction (OR 1.72, 95%-CI 1.38-2.11, FDR = 0.000007), all-cause mortality (OR 1.29, 95%-CI 1.05-1.56, FDR = 0.02), and CVD death (I0-I99); (OR 1.86, 95%-CI 1.27-2.64, FDR = 0.0036) while MH-NWO saw no significant differences. Among female subjects, both MH-NWO (OR 1.37, 95%-CI 1.04-1.78, FDR = 0.03) and MU-NWO (OR 1.78, 95%-CI 1.05-2.83, FDR = 0.03) had increased odds of MASLD. Biochemical and imaging data were consistent with enhanced CVD and MASLD risk. CONCLUSION: MRFs may modulate CVD and MASLD risk in NWO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Normal weight obesity (n=121,586). Metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity (MU-NWO) vs. Healthy normal weight lean reference group was evaluated on Incident ischemic heart disease (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.36-2.05, p=FDR=0.000007). Metabolically unhealthy normal weight obesity was associated with increased odds of ischemic heart disease (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.36-2.05) and cardiovascular death compared to healthy reference groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: