Key result
China-CPET equations predict peak HR in CHD patients with ~9% mean absolute error.
Why the study?
Existing formulas for HR peak and HR VT1 lack accuracy in coronary heart disease patients because they fail to account for pathophysiological differences.
Does a newly developed prediction equation improve the accuracy of estimating peak heart rate and first ventilatory threshold heart rate in patients with coronary heart disease compared to traditional formulas?
Observational (n=14,465)
Yes
Does a newly developed prediction equation improve the accuracy of estimating peak heart rate and first ventilatory threshold heart rate in patients with coronary heart disease compared to traditional formulas?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A newly developed prediction equation based on CPET data from Chinese CHD patients provides significantly higher accuracy for estimating peak heart rate and first ventilatory threshold heart rate than traditional formulas, aiding in individualized exercise prescription.
Background Peak heart rate (HR peak) and first ventilatory threshold heart rate (HR VT1) guide exercise prescription formulation, but existing formulas lack accuracy in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients due to unaccounted pathophysiological differences. This study aimed to construct prediction equation for HR peak and HR VT1 in CHD patients. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective study that included 14,465 cases of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) data from CHD patients in 20 hospitals in China. Seventy percent of the cohort was divided into a development group ( n = 10,125), and the remaining 30% served as a validation group ( n = 4340). Stepwise multiple backward regression established HR peak and HR VT1 equations, with accuracy compared to traditional formulas. Results Age, weight, resting heart rate (HR rest), CHD diagnostic category, and β‐blockers were included in the equation. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of China‐CPET‐HR peak is 9.04%, with an adjusted coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.399. For the China‐CPET‐HR VT1 formula, the MAPE is 7.32% and the adjusted R 2 is 0.509. The %HR peaks of the FOX, TANAKA, KETEYIAN, and China‐CPET‐HR peak formulas are 82 ± 11%, 79 ± 11%, 105 ± 13%, and 100 ± 11%, respectively. Conclusion Based on CPET data from CHD patients, we developed prediction equations for HR peak and HR VT1. The prediction accuracy of these equations is significantly higher than others, which helps to formulate accurate individualized exercise prescriptions and rehabilitation training guidance for CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease (n=14,465). China-CPET prediction equations vs. Traditional formulas (FOX, TANAKA, KETEYIAN) was evaluated on Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and adjusted R2 for HR peak and HR VT1 (MAPE 9.04% (HR peak) and 7.32% (HR VT1)). The China-CPET prediction equations for peak heart rate and first ventilatory threshold heart rate in CHD patients demonstrated mean absolute percentage errors of 9.04% and 7.32%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: