Key result
In ARVC, lead aVR morphology is linked to epicardial scar distribution and RV dysfunction.
Why the study?
Accurate, noninvasive markers reflecting epicardial scar distribution and guiding ablation strategy in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy remain limited.
Does ECG lead aVR morphology predict epicardial RVOT scar distribution and arrhythmic vulnerability in patients with ARVC?
Cohort (n=45)
No
Does ECG lead aVR morphology predict epicardial RVOT scar distribution and arrhythmic vulnerability in patients with ARVC?
Absolute Event Rate: 42.9% vs 60%
p-value: p=0.249
In patients with ARVC, the R/Q ratio and morphology in ECG lead aVR provide a simple, noninvasive marker to predict epicardial RVOT scar distribution and right ventricular dysfunction, aiding in ablation procedural planning.
Accurate, noninvasive markers reflecting epicardial scar distribution and guide ablation strategy in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy remain limited.In this study, the R/Q ratio and morphology in electrocardiography (ECG) lead aVR were associated with right ventricular epicardial scar distribution and may help identify patients who require broader endocardial or epicardial ablation.These electrocardiographic indicators were also associated with right ventricular dysfunction and markers of arrhythmic vulnerability.Our findings suggest a simple ECG-based approach that may assist substrate characterization, procedural planning, and risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (n=45). Epicardial right ventricular outflow tract scar involvement (≥50%) vs. No epicardial right ventricular outflow tract scar involvement (<50%) was evaluated on Post-ablation ventricular arrhythmia recurrence (p=0.249). In patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, ECG lead aVR morphology was associated with epicardial scar distribution and right ventricular dysfunction, though post-ablation ventricular arrhythmia recurrence did not significantly differ based on right ventricular outflow tract scar involvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: