Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Response addresses disagreement on physical interpretation of CPT resonance in quantum frequency standards, suggesting implications for future research.
Dr. Tsygankov commented (see the preceding Comment) on our work Vishnyakov et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 137, 164402 (2025)], expressing disagreement with our physical interpretation of the multi-peak structure of the coherent population trapping (CPT) resonance, which can be observed under the Pound–Drever–Hall-like (PDH) regime of excitation. Below, we provide a brief response to the Comment, from which it follows that our physical interpretation remains unchanged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vishnyakov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: