Hard discrete selection — gating that retains exactly k of n features and suppresses the rest — produces abrupt collapse in task performance as noise increases. This collapse is architecturally invariant: it appears across implementations within the hard-gating class G_hard and is absent in soft attention. We identify selection hardness H_s(G) := H(F_1 | G(F_1)) as the dominant organizing quantity for this collapse behavior: higher H_s corresponds to more discrete, information-destroying gating, and predicts earlier, sharper collapse. F1.1, a minimal extension of hard selection that adds a safety margin of m redundant features, modulates H_s(G_m) without exiting the hard-gating class. Under matched computational budgets (both using 8 effective features), F1.1 outperforms sparsified soft attention (acc=0.755 vs 0.679), establishing a Pareto-superior robustness-compute trade-off. A Saturation Lemma (companion theoretical work) formally predicts that performance differences vanish at extreme noise, explaining the compressed effect size without invalidating the mechanism. Exploratory experiments under high-redundancy regimes show compression of architectural differences, consistent with the regime-dependent interpretation. Together these results establish selection hardness as the dominant organizing quantity for resource-efficient hard-gating architectures within the studied regime. Companion Papers: **Saka, H. (2026a).** Toward a Reframing of the Hard Problem of Consciousness: Subjective Reality, Feeling, andthe Origins of the Conceptual World. Version 7.19. PhilPapers. https://philpapers.org/rec/SAKTAR **Saka, H. (2026b).** Organizational Phenomenology: Artificial F1 and the Geometry of Coherent Agency. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20555024 **Saka, H. (2026c-Theory).** Artificial F1: Full Computational Model — Selection Hardness, Non-Scalarizability, and Phase Transition in Bounded Evaluative Architectures. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20524004 Keywords: sparse gating, hard selection, selection hardness, gating collapse,mixture of experts, inductive bias, noise robustness,compute efficiency, phase transition, representation constitution
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakan Saka (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: