Challenges the notion of certainty in teacher preparation, suggesting a focus on uncertainty in education practices.
This paper responds to the Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education editors’ call for research that engages with the politics of knowledge production in teacher education. Drawing on Chef Edward Lee’s reimagined bibimbap – a dish “already mixed inside” – I question what I call the certainty imperative: the assumption that uncertainty indicates inadequate preparation and that teachers should emerge from programmes with clear competencies and measurable readiness. Through Rivera Cusicanqui’s Ch’ixi thinking, Barad’s intra-action, Chen’s “Asia as Method,” and Stengers’ ecology of practices, I argue that the certainty imperative makes a fundamental onto-epistemic error – it assumes that what teachers know can be separated from who teachers are. The paper proceeds from the inverse assumption: that plurality precedes preparation. Pre-service teachers, like Lee, are already mixed inside with ways of knowing-being that the preparation model cannot see. Rather than offering new techniques or revised competencies, this paper reaches towards a reorientation from delivering certainty towards cultivating professional judgement that can dwell with uncertainty rather than resolve it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelle Ocriciano (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: