Abstract This paper explores the intersection of knowledge politics and policy uptake, drawing on over a decade of collaborative work between the authors at the Tangentyere Council Research Hub. The authors, representing different knowledge systems, have developed a practice that respects both political and epistemic dimensions of their work. Drawing on conversation as a knowledge production strategy, the authors reflect on the work of the Hub in relation to the policy processes their research sought to inform. The paper examines the contested reality of life in Mparntwe/Alice Springs, focusing on the political question of whose knowledge counts in policy directed at Aboriginal people. Recognising the enduring sovereignty and knowledge practices of Aboriginal people, the paper charts how the Research Hub came into being and the role it plays in making Aboriginal perspectives visible. Recognising the dominant role Western knowledge systems play in policy processes, the authors seek to understand why Aboriginal voices and perspectives seem to remain sidelined even when made visible. The paper identifies epistemic injustice as a way to understand how Aboriginal knowledge is overlooked in policy processes, using this concept to explain why Western‐derived processes marginalise Indigenous perspectives. The authors argue for the recognition of Aboriginal knowledge as valuable and essential for effective policy development. They call for a shift in how Aboriginal knowledge is positioned within policy‐making, advocating for a more inclusive and equitable approach that acknowledges the impact of colonial processes, but which, importantly, is focused on recognising and strengthening local knowledge traditions. Points for practitioners Recognition and respect for Aboriginal knowledge : Aboriginal people maintain sovereignty over their lands and have complex knowledge systems that are often ignored or undervalued by Western frameworks. Recognising and respecting these systems is crucial for effective engagement and policy development. Existing policy processes are epistemic and political in nature : Existing policy processes are built on particular ways of knowing the world; assumptions about what issues are important and who the objects of policy are remain embedded in existing practices. Understanding the assumptions underlying one's own practice is essential if one is to engage with others who think and know differently. Epistemic injustice : Epistemic injustice, in which Aboriginal knowledge is often sidelined or considered inferior, should be recognised as arising in and through professional practice. This understanding can help professionals advocate for more inclusive and equitable shared knowledge practices. Dynamic and adaptive practices : The dynamic nature of Aboriginal culture, which adapts to changing circumstances while maintaining core traditions, should be recognised. This adaptability should be acknowledged and supported in professional practices. Advocacy and change : Professionals should advocate for changes in how Aboriginal knowledge is positioned within policy‐making. This includes challenging existing assumptions and working towards more equitable frameworks that recognise the value of diverse knowledge systems.
Campbell et al. (Tue,) studied this question.