Demonstrates asymmetric transfer in RAG systems for wind-turbine maintenance, suggesting corpus richness matters.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for specialized industrial domains face a persistent cold-start problem when high-quality, target-domain training data is scarce. We investigate cross-source transfer in this setting using wind-turbine technical documentation as an industrial testbed. A 3 × 4 factorial experiment over twelve embedding-model configurations reveals an asymmetric transfer pattern: embeddings fine-tuned on a semantically rich bilingual corpus from an alternative manufacturer outperform domain-matched models on the target manufacturer's own test set (MRR 0.7902 vs. 0.7012). A seven-category semantic analysis shows the effect is largest for safety-critical queries (+ 48.2%; n = 21, post-hoc power 0.91), and we report a data-dilution effect in which naive multi-source aggregation degrades performance. Because the two corpora differ along several correlated axes - monolingual lexical density, raw volume, and cross-lingual breadth - we characterize semantic richness with independent, pre-specified metrics (MATTR, MTLD, hapax, Jaccard) and present it as a multi-dimensional, testable construct rather than a single factor. To probe robustness, we evaluated five multi-source mixing protocols (naive concatenation, balanced down-sampling, inverse-frequency oversampling, similarity-based quality filtering, and K-means diversity-aware sampling) against three single-brand baselines on a fourth-manufacturer zero-shot test set (Test D, n = 99). No mixing protocol significantly outperformed the strongest single-brand fine-tune, confirming that the asymmetric transfer effect is robust to data-combination strategy and extends to out-of-distribution generalization. We interpret the observed asymmetry as an empirical pattern within this two-manufacturer benchmark whose broader applicability to other industrial domains remains to be validated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: