Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses carbon dioxide relationship in patients with traumatic brain injury, suggesting unfit ventilation targets.
We aimed to assess the relationship between arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) according to three prehospital hemodynamic status and to evaluate whether hemodynamic-based EtCO₂ targets could improve agreement with PaCO₂. Over a 4-year period, 100 adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI admitted to a level 1 trauma center under mechanical ventilation were retrospectively included. Patients were classified into three clusters based on prehospital hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: Stable without vasopressors; Cluster 2: Stabilized with low-dose vasopressors; Cluster 3: Not stabilized with low-dose vasopressors). Correlation and agreement between paired PaCO₂ and EtCO₂ values were assessed overall and across clusters. Agreement was compared between non-adjusted and cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ thresholds. The mean PaCO 2 - EtCO 2 gradient increased according to the hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: 3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg, Cluster 2: 9.9 ± 7.3 mmHg, Cluster 3: 12.6 ± 9.5 mmHg). The agreement between paired PaCO 2 and non-adjusted EtCO 2 levels decreased between the three clusters (61% [95%CI: 44–77%] in Cluster 1, 42% [95%CI: 25–59%] in Cluster 2, 31% [95%CI: 16–46%] in Cluster 3). Adjusting EtCO₂ targets according to hemodynamic status did not improve agreement between pairs (53% vs. 44%, p = 0.204). In moderate-to-severe TBI, there is a strong relationship between the PaCO₂–EtCO₂ gradient and prehospital hemodynamic status. However, our results did not support the relevance of a prehospital ventilation strategy guided by cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navarro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: